Legal Opinion
State v. McLane
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1984No. CO-83-1311PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Roger McLane appeals his felony conviction for possession of marijuana. He claims inadequacy of counsel for not challenging the search warrant at the omnibus hearing. We affirm.
FACTS
On January 24, 1983, officers obtained a warrant to search Roger MeLane’s house for marijuana. The warrant was based on information obtained from a juvenile, unnamed in the complaint although the name was given to the court separately. The juvenile had seen the marijuana 10 to 14 days before reporting it. The probable cause portion of the warrant was as follows:
Affiant is a duly acting and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Joseph Ward EasterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Vincent Beltempo, Guiseppe Gallina, A/K/A "Fillipo", and Barbara WalbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BrunesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. McLaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984