Legal Opinion
State v. Brunes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1985No. C7-85-368PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Eric Bruñes appeals from an adjudication of guilt for possession of a controlled substance, entered December 20, 1984.
Appellant initially appealed from the omnibus order, a non-appealable order. Rule 29.02, subd. 3, Minn.R.Crim.P. By order of this court February 2, 1985, the appeal was dismissed without prejudice.
Appellant subsequently appealed from the adjudication of guilt entered December 20, 1984. He now seeks review of the omnibus order, claiming the omnibus court erred when it failed to disclose to appellant the identity of the State’s confidential informant, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LiebergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. Pederson-MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. WesselsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State of Minnesota v. Danielle Lynn DeMaraisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014