Legal Opinion

Sather v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1984No. C7-84-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This is an appeal of an order denying appellant’s petition for postconviction relief. Following a series of armed robberies in North Dakota and Minnesota, appellant pled guilty in North Dakota to three counts of armed robbery. Subsequently he pled guilty in Minnesota, although his defense counsel apparently did not realize the North Dakota convictions would count in appellant’s criminal history score. Appellant claims his counsel was ineffective by mismanaging plea negotiations because of his unfamiliarity with Minnesota sentencing law. We affirm.

FACTS

Beginning in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Joseph Ward EasterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re DibleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Weaver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API