Legal Opinion

Sgro v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 5, 1932No. 55PublishedCited by 605 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The petitioner was charged with violating the National Prohibition Act by possessing and selling intoxicating liquor at the Bouckville Hotel. The District Court denied his request to restrain the use of evidence procured by federal officers while searching the hotel under a warrant alleged to be invalid. This evidence was introduced at the trial over his objection. He was found guilty and the judgment against him was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. [54 F. (2d) 1083.] This Court granted certiorari. The only question presented is as to the validity of the warrant.

Subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by605 opinions

  1. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

600 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API