Legal Opinion

State v. Sherwood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1984No. C6-83-1586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for receiving and concealing stolen goods. She challenges the admission of evidence obtained during execution of a warrant to search her home. We affirm.

FACTS

The affidavit in support of the warrant to search defendant’s home stated that, as part of a shoplifting investigation, police placed defendant’s home under surveillance. Police followed defendant and an other woman when they visited Byerly’s, the Ediner, and Southdale shopping center. The women entered the stores carrying coats and large handbags. The affidavit specifies that they…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BalengerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API