A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit for injunction by A. Bourjois & Co., Incorporated, against Anna Katzel. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a New York corporation, is the exclusive owner of certain registered trade-marks for face powder; these trade-marks consisting of the word “Java” and the various labels, which are carried by plaintiffs boxes and serve to identify them as plaintiff’s products. Defendant’s boxes, as will appear infra, are, with two differences, exact duplicates of plaintiff’s boxes.
In 1912, the firm of E. Wertheimer & Cie. of France, Successeurs of A. Bourjois & Cie., also of France, had established in the United States the business in Java face powder in boxes and under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Fred Gretsch Mfg. Co. v. SchoeningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Wertheimer v. Batcheller Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Osawa & Co. v. B & H PHOTODistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Bell & Howell : Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. DashDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.