Legal Opinion

A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. Katzel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 9, 1922No. 190PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill to restrain the infringement of the trade marks “ Java ” and “ Bourjois ” registered in the Patent Office of the United States. A preliminary injunction was granted by the District Court, 274 Fed. 856, but the order was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, one Judge dissenting. 275 Fed. 539. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 257 U. S. 630, In 1913 A. Bourjois & Cie., E. Wertheimer & Cie., Successeurs, jdoing business in France and also in the United States, sold to the plaintiff for a large sum their business in the United States, with their good will and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Boesch v. GraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. A. Bourjois & Co. v. KatzelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Eiseman v. SchifferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  5. A. Bourjois & Co. v. KatzelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross International Imports, Inc., and Roger Myers D/B/A F. Remy & CieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Iberia Foods Corp. v. Rolando Romeo, Jr. D/B/A Rol-Rom Foods Rolando Romeo, Jr., T/a Rol-Rom FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API