Legal Opinion
Bell & Howell : Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1982No. 81 CV 2446 (ERN)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
This trademark case brings into sharp focus the commercially significant question of whether an American company, which is engaged on an exclusive basis in the business of importing and selling trademarked goods of foreign manufacture under United States trademark rights owned by it, may enjoin another’s unauthorized, competitive sale in the United States of the same identically trademarked goods, which were made and placed in the stream of international commerce by the foreign man ufacturer, who did not intend that such goods be sold…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Osawa & Co. v. B & H PHOTODistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of American Trademarks v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. DashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.