Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Dash
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. FACTS
A. The Parties
B. The Trademark
C. Defendants’ Action
D. The Complaint
III. DISCUSSION
A. Section 33(b). Exclusive Right to Use
B. Section 32(l)(a). Unauthorized Use
1. Confusion — Genuine Goods
2. Exhaustion Doctrine — Separate and Independent Good Will
3. Likelihood of Confusion
C. Unauthorized Importation
IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
The instant trademark infringement action concerns the importation and sale of what is commonly referred to as “grey market” goods. Grey market goods are goods produced by a foreign manufacturer bearing the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. v. Ozak Trading, Inc. Doron GratchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Sultana Crackers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Caputo v. FauverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. DashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- SBK Catalogue Partnership v. Orion Pictures Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.