Legal Opinion

Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Dash

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-2157PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. FACTS

A. The Parties

B. The Trademark

C. Defendants’ Action

D. The Complaint

III. DISCUSSION

A. Section 33(b). Exclusive Right to Use

B. Section 32(l)(a). Unauthorized Use

1. Confusion — Genuine Goods

2. Exhaustion Doctrine — Separate and Independent Good Will

3. Likelihood of Confusion

C. Unauthorized Importation

IV. CONCLUSION

I. INTRODUCTION

The instant trademark infringement action concerns the importation and sale of what is commonly referred to as “grey market” goods. Grey market goods are goods produced by a foreign manufacturer bearing the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. v. Ozak Trading, Inc. Doron GratchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Sultana Crackers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. Caputo v. FauverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  4. Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. DashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. SBK Catalogue Partnership v. Orion Pictures Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API