Legal Opinion
Coty v. Prestonettes, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 31, 1922No. 112PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge,
This suit is brought for the infringement of trade-marks and a preliminary injunction as prayed for has been denied, although a limited restriction has been placed upon the defendant.
The plaintiff is a citizen of the republic of France and a resident of the city of Paris. Under section 24 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 991), an alien can sue a citizen of the United States in a federal court, He must, however, sue in the district in which the citizen resides. The alienage of the plaintiff of itself gives jurisdiction to a court of the United States as against a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Apollinaris Co. v. SchererU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
- People v. . LuhrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- A. Bourjois & Co. v. KatzelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Lopeno Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Coty, Inc. v. Parfums De Grande Luxe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Fioret Sales Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.