Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1994No. 92-989PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue in this case is whether National acted contrary to law in replacing its West Raymond mill with a like-kind mill without obtaining a PTI from the OEPA. Resolution of this issue hinges on an interpretation of certain administrative rules promulgated by the Director of OEPA.
Former R.C. 3704.03(F)1 authorized the Director of OEPA to “[a]dopt, modify, and repeal rules consistent with the purposes of this chapter prohibiting the location, installation, construction, or modification of any air contaminant source * * * unless an installation permit therefor has been obtained from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones Metal Products Co. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Brown v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Brost v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Narragansett Improvement Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
3Cited by61 opinions
- State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State ex rel. Ryan v. State Teachers Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Morning View Care Center-Fulton v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State ex rel. Reyna v. Natalucci-PersichettiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.