Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Brown v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1982No. 81-1134PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
Each party raises a distinct issue. The state argues that the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the schedule of compliance is not an enforceable term or condition of the NPDES permit. DMI contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence pertaining to DMI’s financial condition. We agree with the state that a schedule of compliance is an enforceable term or condition of an NPDES permit. Otherwise, we affirm the Court of Appeals.
I
R.C. Chapter 6111 embodies the response of the General Assembly to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. See R.C. 6111.01(L);…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Chesapeake Foundation v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- United States v. T & S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.