State ex rel. Ryan v. State Teachers Retirement System
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Respondents agree that Ryan does not have an adequate alternative remedy and that mandamus is the proper vehicle to determine her claims. See State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 86, 88, 537 N.E.2d 646, 647 (claim by public employee of entitlement to wages or benefits granted by statute actionable in mandamus); State ex rel. Kmart v. Westlake Planning Comm. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 151, 158, 624 N.E.2d 714, 720 (declaratory judgment not. an adequate remedy where incomplete without a mandatory injunction). Respondents dispute whether Ryan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Richard v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Helman v. Epl Prolong, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.