Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reyna v. Natalucci-Persichetti

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1998No. 98-45PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Reyna asserts in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in failing to grant him longevity pay, a monetary sum in lieu of accrued, unused vacation credit, and costs. For the reasons that follow, we hold Reyna’s contentions to be meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Reyna contends in his first proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in denying longevity pay to which he is entitled pursuant to former R.C. 124.181.

Former R.C. 124.181, in effect at the time DYS hired Reyna, provided:

“(A) Except as provided in division (M) of this section, any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Frailey v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Hulls v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kleemann v. Carriage Trace, Inc., 21873 (8-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. L.G. Harris Family Ltd. Partnership I v. 905 S. Main St. Englewood, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API