Brost v. State Medical Board

In her report to the board, the hearing examiner stated, in part, that:

“Dr. Brost’s acts include knowingly furnishing drugs to an addict, prescribing without medical indication to the detriment of a patient, and misadministration of controlled substances. For such acts, the Board’s disciplinary guidelines indicate revocation as the minimum sanction. * * *” (Emphasis added.)

By the requisite vote of six members, the board adopted, without qualification, the hearing examiner’s report.

The disciplinary guidelines referred to by the examiner have been adopted by the board. The guidelines provide…