Legal Opinion

Jones Metal Products Co. v. Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1972No. 71-317PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

Appellants admit that they have pursued a policy of employment practices, the effect of which has been to treat its female employees differently from its male employees, solely because of their sex,

*175Appellants contend that this differing treatment is required by R. C. 4107.42, 4107.43 and 4107.46(A), 4107.-46(B) and 4107.46(E), and that Title VII prohibits differing treatment of male and female employees solely on the basis of sex.1 Thns, it is argued that the above-mentioned Ohio statutes are inconsistent with Title VII and, by virtue of the Supremacy Clause2 of the United States…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sessions v. Morales-SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Williams v. General Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API