Legal Opinion

People v. Lowell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1946No. Crim. 4060PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Appellants were charged, each in a separate information, with having contributed to the delinquency of minors, the specific charges being that each engaged in an act of sexual intercourse with a different minor on a different date. When the eases came on for trial appellants stipulated, and the district attorney agreed, that the two informations be consolidated for the purpose of trial and that appellants be tried together. Both were convicted, both made motions for new trials which were denied, and both have appealed from the respective judgments of conviction and from the orders denying new…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. PoindexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API