Legal Opinion

Samuelson v. Samuelson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 25, 1928No. [No. 23, April Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The complainant in a bill in equity for annulment of a marriage appeals from the refusal of the relief, and a decree dismissing her bill. The contention of the complainant was that the marriage, although valid in form, and solemnized by her full, free consent before a minister of the Christian religion, was entered into subject to an agreement of the parties that it should be without effect unless they should subsequently have a second ceremony before a Hebrew rabbi, and the defendant denied this. And the questions raised are first, that of the fact, and second, that of law — whether parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Hills v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Le Brun v. Le Brun ex rel. RandallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Feehley v. FeehleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Wimbrough v. WimbroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Picarella v. PicarellaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Carr v. CarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  3. Lurz v. LurzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Gerardi v. GerardiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Pritchard v. PurcellHigh Court of American Samoa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API