Legal Opinion

Lurz v. Lurz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 19, 1936No. [No. 25, April Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The bill of complaint in this case alleges that the infant plaintiff, who was eighteen years old when it was filed on September 4th, 1935, became acquainted, at the age of fifteen years, with the defendant, who was then twenty years old, and they had frequent associations without the knowledge of the plaintiff’s parents; that as the result of “solicitation and womanly arts practiced upon him by the defendant,” he cohabited with her on numerous occasions; that the plaintiff was then attending school, but the defendant “would continuously seek out the infant plaintiff wherever he might be and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corder v. CorderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Wimbrough v. WimbroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Owings v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Samuelson v. SamuelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Picarella v. PicarellaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Hitchens v. HitchensDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API