Feehley v. Feehley
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Bond, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The appellant and appellee were married in November, 1891. A daughter was bom as a result of their union. In September, 1896, they were divorced. Fifteen years later, at the instance of the daughter, then grown to young womanhood, they were re-united. There were intervening marriages by both parties which were dissolved by judicial decree, the appellant having had one, and the appellee two, such intermediate experiences. The re-union occurred in September, ' 1915. In October of the following year the appellee filed her bill of complaint against the appellant for alimony, and for the division…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Harrison v. State ex rel. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Denison v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Carabetta v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- DePotty v. DePottySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Picarella v. PicarellaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Hornbake v. HornbakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.