Legal Opinion

Mirizio v. Mirizio

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1926PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hiscock, Ch. J.

This action is brought under the provisions of section 1162 of the Civil Practice Act, alleging that the defendant as plaintiff's husband has abandoned and refused to support her and demanding judgment of separation with provision for support. ' The defense which thus far has been sustained is that the plaintiff has refused to live with the defendant and discharge her marital obligations and that, therefore, he has been relieved from any duty of support. There is little dispute of fact. Plaintiff and defendant were united in marriage by a civil ceremony but they were observers…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Prall v. PrallSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Fritz v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bohmert v. BohmertNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Hawkins v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. French v. McAnarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Schine v. SchineNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Woronzoff-Daschkoff v. Woronzoff-DaschkoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API