Legal Opinion

Pritchard v. Purcell

High Court of American Samoa

Decided April 18, 1989No. DR No. 65-88Published

1Opinion of the Court

This action is for annulment of a marriage. Respondent was served in New Zealand by certified mail and has not answered.

Petitioner testified that in 1984 she asked respondent to marry her for the sole purpose of obtaining permanent resident status in New Zealand. She further testified that she gave respondent money in exchange for his participation in the fraudulent marriage; that neither party intended, at the time of the ceremony, to "consummate" the marriage; that they never did have sexual relations; and that they did not live together.

Petitioner says she purchased a house and a car which…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API