Legal Opinion

Vossen v. Forrester

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 951769; CA A96078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s issuance of a mandatory injunction ordering him to remove all encroachments, including his home, from a 16-foot easement in plaintiffs’ favor. On de novo review, ORS 19.425(3), we reverse and remand.

Defendant Norman Forrester bought a beachfront lot in Yachats in November 1993, after making inquiries of the city planner about whether a house could be built on the lot and receiving an affirmative answer. A title report on the property disclosed the existence of an easement described only by reference to Book 128, Page 315, Deed Records of Lincoln County, as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mattson v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hickman v. Six Dimension Custom Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Nyman v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilterbrand v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Bruns v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API