Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clark

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1926No. 16411PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by Hattie Clark, defendant in error, plaintiff below, againsc Charles T. Smith, doing business as Smith Sand Company, and F. M. Figg, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover damages for personal injury and damages to her car on account of collision! on a public road.

The -parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the lower court.

The record shows that plaintiff was the owner of a Ford sedan automobile and was driving the same along the public highway between Tulsa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Government Street Lumber Co. v. OllingerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Watkins v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Schaff v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Belford v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Union Transportation Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API