Bailey v. Sisson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Tulsa county sustaining plaintiff’s motion for new trial in a personal injury action. The parties are here referred to as they appeared at the trial.
While the formal order sustaining said motion assigns no particular reason therefor, the court in ruling upon the motion ordered as follows:
“Let the record show in this case that the court sustains the motion for a new trial on the sole and only ground that he does not agree with the verdict of the jury.”
Defendant says that the foregoing ruling constituted an abuse of discretion.
A motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Yarnell v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Ten Cate v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- White v. DougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. MoroneyArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Belford v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Gripe v. GrievesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Singleton v. ValianosArizona Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.