Legal Opinion
McMahan v. McCafferty
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1952No. 34364PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant in error sued the plaintiffs in error, and upon trial a verdict was returned for the plaintiffs in error. A timely motion for a new trial was filed by the defendant in error, which was sustained, and a new trial ordered. From this order the plaintiffs in error appeal. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff alleged, in substance, that, while the defendant, Joe Mc-Mahan, was operating a truck under a Class “B” permit in hauling grain from the field of the plaintiff to an elevator, a fire broke out and destroyed wheat belonging to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Poynter v. Beacon Falls Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Jones v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. WhombleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Great Western Motor Lines, Inc. v. CozardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.