Legal Opinion
State v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 2008No. A08-0335PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Respondent Jeremy Michael Palmer has filed a motion to dismiss this prosecution appeal from a pretrial order, arguing that the appeal was not timely filed. Appellant State of Minnesota has filed a response to the motion. Because we conclude that the appeal was timely filed, we deny the motion to dismiss.
FACTS
Palmer was charged with felony driving while impaired based on a traffic stop that revealed indicia of intoxication. Palmer agreed to take an Intoxilyzer test, which showed a .14 alcohol concentration.
Palmer moved for discovery of the source code…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. KiminskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. WollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Toth v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997