State v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Appellant Nadezhda Wood1 appeals her petty misdemeanor traffic-violation convictions, arguing that (1) the complaint must be dismissed because of ineffective service; (2) the complaint must be dismissed because it lacks probable cause; and (3) her right to confront witnesses was violated when the district court denied her subpoena request. Because service of the complaint was not required, Wood has not shown that prejudice resulted from the probable-cause finding, and the district court acted within its discretion in denying the subpoena request, we affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Wayne Leonard Heinz.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014