Legal Opinion
State v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1998No. CX-97-905PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
As a consequence of an obvious miseommu-nication regarding the trial court’s concerns about police entry into a motel room, the state’s proof at the omnibus hearing failed to address several important issues essential to a determination of the constitutionality of a search. We therefore reverse and remand for a reopening of the omnibus hearing.
At approximately 2:00 a.m. on January 12, 1997, three Winona police officers, travelling in two vehicles, responded to a call for assistance to remove occupants from a room at the Riverport Inn Motel due to excessive noise. Upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Dawayne LesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.