Legal Opinion

State v. Franson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 2018No. A18-0539PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalbrooks, Judge

Following his conviction of failing to register as a predatory offender, appellant argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to impose a ten-year term of conditional release. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Michael Allen Franson was required to register as a predatory offender following his 1987 conviction of criminal sexual conduct. In 2009, he pleaded guilty to one count of failing to register as a predatory offender. The district court sentenced Franson to 15 months in prison, a mitigated durational departure, but failed to include the statutorily mandated conditional-release term. See…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. CalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TorresSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2025
  2. Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API