Legal Opinion

SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 2010No. A09-1044PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Appellant Lonnie Singelman challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of her medical-malpractice action, arguing that she served the summons on respondent within the time allowed by the applicable statute of limitations. Because we conclude that Singelman did not commence the action within the limitations period, we affirm.

FACTS

Singelman alleges that respondent St. Francis Medical Center (SFMC) committed medical malpractice on July 12, 2004. While preparing Singelman for surgery, a nurse stuck an IV needle into Singelman’s left arm, hitting a nerve. The impact with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Brenner v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Energy Transfer LP (formerly known as Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.) v. Greenpeace International ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API