Legal Opinion

Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2004No. A03-742PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant brought an action against respondent insurance company, seeking recovery of no-fault benefits under her auto mobile insurance policy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent, concluding that the action was barred by the six-year statute of limitations applicable to contract actions, which began to run when appellant’s no-fault benefits were discontinued. Appellant challenges the entry of summary judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Karyn Entzion was injured in an automobile accident in January 1992. Entzion filed a claim with respondent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miernicki v. Duluth Curling ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API