In Re the Welfare of T.D.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge
Appellant KL.D.’s parental rights to T.D. were terminated by default. Appellant moved the district court to vacate the order arguing that: (1) the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over her due to insufficient service by publication; (2) procedural irregularities resulted in a denial of due-process rights; and (3) the district court improperly considered whether appellant had a meritorious defense in deciding appellant’s motion to vacate the final order. Because the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over appellant due to deficient service by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Gill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of M.L.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007