Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of T.D.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 2001No. C4-00-2208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge

Appellant KL.D.’s parental rights to T.D. were terminated by default. Appellant moved the district court to vacate the order arguing that: (1) the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over her due to insufficient service by publication; (2) procedural irregularities resulted in a denial of due-process rights; and (3) the district court improperly considered whether appellant had a meritorious defense in deciding appellant’s motion to vacate the final order. Because the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over appellant due to deficient service by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Gill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Children of M.L.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API