Westerman v. Richardson

This appeal presents two issues:(1) Did the trial court err in, as a matter of law, construing the coverage provisions of the garage liability policy so as to exclude coverage on Leonard Richardson’s owned automobile?(2) Did the trial court err in concluding that no questions of estoppel or misrepresentation were involved demanding a trial ?

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting respondent insurance company’s motion for summary judgment. The provisions of the summary judgment statute (sec. 270.635, Stats.) are familiar. The rules governing the disposition of summary…