Legal Opinion

Commercial Discount Corp. v. Milwaukee Western Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1974No. 192PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

We have often stated that summary judgment is a drastic remedy and is not a substitute for demurrer, judgment on the pleadings, or a motion to make a pleading more definite and certain. Of course, summary judgment should not be granted where the material facts are in dispute or permit inconsistent inferences as to necessary ultimate facts. We have even said that a trial court, in the exercise of its discretion, need not in all cases decide questions of law upon a motion for summary judgment.

The summary judgment statute vests discretion in the trial court as to whether the case should be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Hawpetoss v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. P.A. Bergner & Co. v. Bank One, Milwaukee, N.A. (In re P.A. Bergner & Co.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Citizens National Bank v. Mid-States Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. First National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Iola State Bank v. BolanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Mannino v. DavenportWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API