Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Soffer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 27, 1981PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.
The plaintiffs’ amended complaint states the following allegations which are pertinent to a disposition of this appeal. The plaintiffs own a tract of land upon which they are constructing numerous one-family houses. The defendants operate a poultry business on land which abuts the plaintiffs’ property. Buildings that do not conform to the zoning regulations of the town of Branford are located on the defendants’ property, less than fifty feet from the plaintiffs’ property line. In April, 1979, the defendants began enlarging and altering the nonconforming buildings in violation of both the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Country Lands, Inc. v. SwinnertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Savage v. AronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.