Legal Opinion

United States v. McClelland

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 4, 1988No. ACMR 8701012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

Appellant asserts that the record of trial fails to reflect service of the staff judge advocate’s (SJA) post-trial recommendation on his trial defense counsel. Our review of the record leads us to the contrary conclusion.

First, paragraph 7 of the post-trial recommendation states that the recommendation was served on the defense counsel. Second, a memorandum in the record, signed by a noncommissioned officer in the Criminal Law Division of the SJA’s office, states that the trial defense counsel waived submission of post-trial matters. Thus, we find that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. GuerreroU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HallumsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. SnobergerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. RichU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API