United States v. McClelland
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CARMICHAEL, Judge:
Appellant asserts that the record of trial fails to reflect service of the staff judge advocate’s (SJA) post-trial recommendation on his trial defense counsel. Our review of the record leads us to the contrary conclusion.
First, paragraph 7 of the post-trial recommendation states that the recommendation was served on the defense counsel. Second, a memorandum in the record, signed by a noncommissioned officer in the Criminal Law Division of the SJA’s office, states that the trial defense counsel waived submission of post-trial matters. Thus, we find that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. GuerreroU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HallumsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. SnobergerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. RichU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988