Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 24, 1991No. ACM 29046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

Sergeant Wilson was caught in an FBI “sting” designed to net bigger fish at Ogden Air Logistics Center, the web of which was fine enough to catch his 17 months of diverse thefts and nine sales of military property. He was convicted according to his pleas of guilty1 and now asserts errors relating only to the post-trial handling of his case. We find no errors and affirm.

Appellant has four complaints about the staff judge advocate’s post-trial recommendations under R.C.M. 1106 to the convening authority: that the recommendations incorrectly state the maximum…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. FoyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. GodreauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. Diaz-CarreroU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CrawfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. SettleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. WilliamsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. BakcsiUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API