Legal Opinion

United States v. Hallums

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 11, 1988No. ACMR 8701998PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HOLDAWAY, Chief Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of two specifications of forcible sodomy against his daughter. One specification alleged that the offenses took place on divers occasions when the girl was under the age of 16 years. The second specification alleged a single act subsequent to her 16th birthday.1 He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures. At the time he sentenced the appellant, the military judge recommended suspension of the punishment in excess of forfeitures of $300.00 per month for twelve months; the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LeiningerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. McClellandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. ShawU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. PraterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. StarksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API