United States v. Rich
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CARMICHAEL, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of burglary and assault with intent to commit rape in violation of Articles 129 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 929 and 934 (1982).
Two of the appellant’s three assignments of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain this conviction. The appellant argues that his conviction must be reversed because the government failed to prove that the victim was not his wife.
Admittedly, trial counsel did not ask the victim whether or not she was the wife of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. GuilfordU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ClearUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. McLemoreU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. CalderonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. PattugalanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988