Legal Opinion
Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 18, 1982No. 4-77-Civ. 201PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LARSON, Senior District Judge.
The motions pending for consideration by this Court require the Court to evaluate various contentions regarding the validity and enforceability of the two patents in suit, the Moser patent, U.S. Patent No. 3,660,163, and the Schneider patent, U.S. Patent No. 3,674,562, the infringement of those patents by plaintiff Medtronic, Inc., and the amount of damages required to compensate defendant Catalyst Research Corporation (CRC), the owner of the two patents, for plaintiff’s infringement. Much of the factual background to this action has been…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Presidio Components Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- HB Fuller Co. v. National Starch and Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.