Legal Opinion
HB Fuller Co. v. National Starch and Chemical Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 21, 1988No. Civ. 4-85-1632PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER INCORPORATING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff H.B. Fuller Co. (Fuller) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, having its principal place of business in St. Paul, Minnesota. Defendant National Starch & Chemical Corporation (National) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Fuller commenced an action for a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity and non-infringement,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Gen-Probe, Inc. v. Amoco Corp., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.