Legal Opinion
Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 4, 1985No. CV 81-3262 AWTPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TASHIMA, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action in which defendant has counterclaimed for a declaration of invalidity. The patents in suit pertain to a bubble blood oxygenator (the “lung” portion of the heart-lung machine employed during open-heart surgery). The action was tried to a jury which, after a lengthy trial, rendered its verdict for plaintiff on all issues. The special verdict included, inter alia, the jury’s findings that none of the claims in suit was invalid, that plaintiff was entitled to recover for its lost profits in the amount of $17,528,000,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Etc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle M.B.H. v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- T.A. Pelsue Co. v. Grand Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.