Legal Opinion

Western Stamping Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 11, 1968No. C.D. 3554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

This action was instituted by Western Stamping Corporation, an American manufacturer, pursuant to the provisions contained in 19 U.S.C., section 1516 (b), against an importation of certain merchandise designated as a “Marxwriter 200”, imported by the party in interest, Louis Marx & Co., Inc. The merchandise was classified by defendant as a nonautomatic typewriter with hand-operated keyboard under item 676.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and admitted free of duty.

By a timely protest filed, plaintiff contends the Marxwriter is a toy and is, therefore, properly subject to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Protests 111458-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co.United States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Simon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. J.C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. Western Stamping Corporation v. The United States (Louis Marx & Co., Inc., Party-In-Interest)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API