Springob v. Farrar
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Chief Judge:
V. Les Springob appeals from a decision by a special referee that he did not have an easement over property owned by Michael L. Farrar and Yvonne Farrar. We affirm.
I
Dr. Narayan R. Shenoy owned a lot (Lot 14) in the Spring • Valley subdivision in Columbia, and his wife owned the adjoining lot (Lot 13). The Shenoys’ home was located on Lot 13, the lot titled solely in Mrs. Shenoy’s name, while Lot 14, Dr. Shenoy’s lot, was vacant. The Shenoys built a well on Lot 14 and attached it to an irrigation system serving Lot 13.
In May 1986, Dr. Shenoy sold Lot 14 to L.G.B., Inc. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Thomson v. WadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Windham v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Penza v. Pendleton Station, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Snow v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Windham v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.