Legal Opinion
Windham v. Riddle
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 20, 2009No. 26586PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BEATTY:
In this declaratory judgment action brought by Dorothy Windham, the master-in-equity found Donald and Jennifer Riddle (the Riddles) have an appurtenant easement for access and irrigation purposes across Windham’s property. The Court of Appeals reversed the master-in-equity’s holding. Windham v. Riddle, 370 S.C. 415, 635 S.E.2d 558 (Ct.App.2006). This Court granted the Riddles’ petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Riddles and Windham are adjacent property owners in Orangeburg County. Both parties…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Sandy Island Corp. v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Newman v. MichelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Santoro v. SCHULTHESSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Proctor v. SteedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.