Legal Opinion

Windham v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 7, 2006No. 4145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, J.:

In this property dispute, Dorothy Windham appeals the master-in-equity’s finding that Donald and Jennifer Riddle (the Riddles) had an appurtenant easement for irrigation purposes over property owned by Windham. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The Riddles and Windham are adjacent property owners in Orangeburg County. Both parties purchased their property from a common grantor, Danny Covington. Covington purchased the combined property in 1991 from Edisto Farm Credit. The previous owner, Marvin Davis, had used the property as a dairy farm. In 1992, Covington had the property surveyed and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Springob v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Haselden v. ScheinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Windham v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Proctor v. SteedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Braden's Folly, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  5. Windham v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API