Legal Opinion
Snow v. Smith
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided March 2, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2013-002727; No. 5386PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
In this easement action, a group of homeowners contend the master-in-equity erred in finding (1) their easement was limited to ingress and egress and (2) the restrictive covenants do not apply to the Lake Access Lot. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Charles S. Coleman, Sr. and E.L. Stoudenmire (Developers) developed Hilton Place subdivision in 1983. The Restrictions were filed on October 12, 1983. The Restrictions stated, “No lot or property conveyed hereunder shall be used for any other than private residential purposes of one family, except by and with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- South Carolina Community Bank v. Salon Proz, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Wilson v. S.C. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- MST, LLC v. North American Land TrustDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Maybank 2754, LLC v. Eugene J. ZurloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
- Susan Brooks Knott Floyd v. Elizabeth Pope Knott DrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024