Legal Opinion

Piliero v. Adler & Stavros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 6, 2000, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) which was to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see, Glamm v Allen, 57 *512NY2d 87; Goicoechea v Law Offs. of Stephen R. Kihl, 234 AD2d 507; Garden City Imaging Ctr. v Lawrence & Walsh, 234 AD2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Kupplungbau GmbH v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Coyne v. BersaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Aaron v. Roemer, Wallens & Mineaux, L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Farage v. EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Kanter v. PieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Aseel v. Jonathan E. Kroll & Associates, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Rupolo v. FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Pellati v. Lite & LiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API