Legal Opinion

Dunner v. Hoover

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1941No. Civ. 12807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to enforce the rescission of a contract executed by plaintiff and defendant September 30, 1938. The ground alleged as the basis for rescission was fraud in that defendant never intended to perform any of the terms and conditions of the contract which provided for the sale to defendant by plaintiff of a milk route and certain equipment, including a truck, subject to an indebtedness in the sum of $434.05, certain bottles and cases in use by the Sunny Brook Dairy, a list of a sufficient number of customers of that dairy or others to enable defendant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Richfield Oil Co. of California v. Hercules Gasoline Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Bandy v. WestoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Emirzian v. AsatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartley v. KarasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Korabek v. Weaver Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Turner v. Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Del Porto v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API